On Tue, 11 May 2010, David Goodman wrote:
Censorship is normally used to mean a refusal to
include something on
the basis of content, not on the basis of form or external
characteristics. Not including a picture because it does not have a
free license is not censorship, not including it because it's of poor
quality is not censorship, not including it because of what it shows
is censorship. NOT CENSORED means in the image context that there is
no image that we reject because of what it portrays.
In that case removing private social security numbers or even dates of birth
is still censorship. Removing the Brian Peppers page is censorship. Even
removing illegal content is censorship.
The no censorship rule isn't, and never has been, an absolute 100% no
exceptions rule. It's no different from any other rule in this regard.