On Tue, 11 May 2010, David Goodman wrote:
Censorship is normally used to mean a refusal to include something on the basis of content, not on the basis of form or external characteristics. Not including a picture because it does not have a free license is not censorship, not including it because it's of poor quality is not censorship, not including it because of what it shows is censorship. NOT CENSORED means in the image context that there is no image that we reject because of what it portrays.
In that case removing private social security numbers or even dates of birth is still censorship. Removing the Brian Peppers page is censorship. Even removing illegal content is censorship.
The no censorship rule isn't, and never has been, an absolute 100% no exceptions rule. It's no different from any other rule in this regard.