On Tue, 26 May 2009, Ian Woollard wrote:
Wikipedia
should not provide information that is likely to lead to harm.
If there's a rule which says that we must provide it, then that rule is
wrong.
Uh huh. And if it also is possible to use the information to avoid
harm? What if it's only a tiny amount of harm, should it be removed
then?
There's an aswer to this.
Think.
There's *no rule* you can use for this. You *have* to consider it case by
case.