On Tue, 26 May 2009, Ian Woollard wrote:
Wikipedia should not provide information that is likely to lead to harm. If there's a rule which says that we must provide it, then that rule is wrong.
Uh huh. And if it also is possible to use the information to avoid harm? What if it's only a tiny amount of harm, should it be removed then?
There's an aswer to this.
Think.
There's *no rule* you can use for this. You *have* to consider it case by case.