On 2/1/06, Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
1890 edits at a
very low edit rate. Little evidence of vandle fighting and has
failed to create any featured articles. The distibution of edits is
pretty good
although
a little low on article space. Would probably get
through RFA but
would not be completely clear cut.
In another 30 edits, that could be describing me :)
Seriously though:
Username Jimbo Wales
Total edits 1890
Image uploads 9 (7 cur, 2 old)
Distinct pages edited 727
Edits/page (avg) 2.60
First edit 2001-03-27 20:47:31
Articles 417
Talk 211
User 128
User talk 809
Project 198
Project talk 62
1 in 4 edits actually in the article space, and twice as many on user
pages? Not to mention 128 edits to his own user page? I'm not sure
what measure you use to judge "pretty good" edit distribution - the
guy is clearly not here to create an encyclopaedia :)
On the other hand, the high number of "talk", "user talk", and
"wikipedia" edits could indicate that the user is pretty good at
calming down edit wars -- exactly the sort of person we want as an
admin. You'd have to check a sample of his edits to determine this.
--
Mark Wagner
[[User:Carnildo]]