On 2/1/06, Steve Bennett stevage@gmail.com wrote:
1890 edits at a very low edit rate. Little evidence of vandle fighting and has failed to create any featured articles. The distibution of edits is
pretty good although
a little low on article space. Would probably get through RFA but
would not be completely clear cut.
In another 30 edits, that could be describing me :)
Seriously though:
Username Jimbo Wales Total edits 1890 Image uploads 9 (7 cur, 2 old) Distinct pages edited 727 Edits/page (avg) 2.60
First edit 2001-03-27 20:47:31
Articles 417 Talk 211 User 128 User talk 809 Project 198 Project talk 62
1 in 4 edits actually in the article space, and twice as many on user pages? Not to mention 128 edits to his own user page? I'm not sure what measure you use to judge "pretty good" edit distribution - the guy is clearly not here to create an encyclopaedia :)
On the other hand, the high number of "talk", "user talk", and "wikipedia" edits could indicate that the user is pretty good at calming down edit wars -- exactly the sort of person we want as an admin. You'd have to check a sample of his edits to determine this.
-- Mark Wagner [[User:Carnildo]]