Erik Moeller wrote:
Jtkiefer:
Creationism is a prickly problem, wikipedia can't really take either side due to the fact that no matter what you write on it it's almost impossible to avoid POV pushing.
Stating that creationism is pseudoscience is not POV-pushing. Maybe Intelligent Design, which is a bit more controversial -- but creationism as in "God created the World", where it makes "scientific" claims, is pretty much universally regarded as pseudoscience by people from existing scientific disciplines.
Erik _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Your right calling creationism a science would be POV pushing, but if you take the stance that creationism is anything, science, pseudo-science, legend, myth, total bullshit... you're still gonna piss someone off which is an inherent problem with having an open medium like wikipedia.
-Jtkiefer