Erik Moeller wrote:
Jtkiefer:
Creationism is a prickly problem, wikipedia
can't really take
either side due to the fact that no matter what you write on it it's
almost impossible to avoid POV pushing.
Stating that creationism is pseudoscience is not POV-pushing. Maybe
Intelligent Design, which is a bit more controversial -- but
creationism as in "God created the World", where it makes
"scientific"
claims, is pretty much universally regarded as pseudoscience by people
from existing scientific disciplines.
Erik
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Your right calling creationism a science would be POV pushing, but if
you take the stance that creationism is anything, science,
pseudo-science, legend, myth, total bullshit... you're still gonna piss
someone off which is an inherent problem with having an open medium like
wikipedia.
-Jtkiefer