MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
We can't lower the bar.
Admins need to be neutral, have a good grasp of policy and be
non-destructive.
We can't grant someone admin powers without knowing if they fulfill those
criteria.
I've already mentioned this elsewhere in this thread, but I'll say this
again here in response to you:
Admins need to be neutral on the whole, but individual admins need not -
just like individual editors need not have good intentions (i.e. we can
handle vandals). Simply de-admin those that aren't.
We *CAN* grant admin powers without knowing if they fulfill any criteria
at all - knowing full well that we can remove those admin powers again
as soon as they fail the criteria.
Timwi