On 10/21/07, Oldak Quill <oldakquill(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 21/10/2007, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org>
wrote:
On 10/21/07, Andrew Gray
<shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 21/10/2007, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org>
wrote:
Anyway, for all I know they've already gotten
permission. Who would
be the one to contact about this?
No idea. But they don't need permission; they are under no legal or
moral or ethical obligation to ask for it;
Wow, I'm rather surprised by that. Ohwell.
I'm not sure I understand what the problem is here.
The problem is that this book isn't free content.
A book has been
published about how to contribute to Wikipedia and some are worrying
about whether we should threaten them for using "Wikipedia" in the
title?
I'm the only one commenting on that, and I wasn't worrying about it, I
was suggesting it. Of course, Andrew Gray says it's not a viable plan
anyway.
Such a book could only help Wikipedia.
If it were free content it'd help Wikipedia even more, though.
Firefox became too concerned
with their name and it's usage, and people stopped using it (Debian) -
who does that help?
This has nothing to do with Firefox.