From:
"Tony Sidaway" <minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com>
Sean:
Believe it or not, we have good reasons to look things up while at
work, including articles about people. If any biographical article
can have a nude of that person, however, we won't be using Wikipedia
to do so.
Why not?
Corporate policy prohibits all images of nudity, out of fear of sexual
harassment lawsuits. Repeat offenses result in termination. I love
Wikipedia, but I'm not going to lose my job because the Wikipedia
community feels it necessary to show bare boobies.
The chance of seeing a picture containing nudity applies to the whole of
the WWW. Surely the logical thing to do is to suppress image downloads.
That way you only see the pictures you want to see, and you get all the
text.