They've stuck around. There are quite a number of scientists on Wikipedia. We are not about to give up on things like that. But that does not mean I do not support articles of other types as well. To everyone, some things appear foolishly insignificant. That's not a good criterion no matter against what it is used.
On Feb 5, 2008 9:28 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 2/5/2008 6:22:01 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, dgoodmanny@gmail.com writes:
WP does in fact do just this with asteroids,m where the number that have been identified is very much larger; however, people keep trying to delete those combined articles.>>
People try to delete "List of fattest humans" It's a critical mass (excuse my expression), once you get a few dozen people fighting to preserve articles on lists of asteroids, it'll stick around.
Will Johnson
**************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000... 48) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l