They've stuck around. There are quite a number of scientists on
Wikipedia. We are not about to give up on things like that. But that
does not mean I do not support articles of other types as well. To
everyone, some things appear foolishly insignificant. That's not a
good criterion no matter against what it is used.
On Feb 5, 2008 9:28 PM, <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 2/5/2008 6:22:01 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
dgoodmanny(a)gmail.com writes:
WP does in fact do just this with asteroids,m where the number that
have been identified is very much larger; however, people keep trying
to delete those combined articles.>>
------------------------------------------------------
People try to delete "List of fattest humans"
It's a critical mass (excuse my expression), once you get a few dozen people
fighting to preserve articles on lists of asteroids, it'll stick around.
Will Johnson
**************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.
(
http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp0030000…
48)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG