White Cat wrote:
I personally started quite a number of stubs myself.
Although they are
trivial to cite (the cities are there for example), I do not have that kind
of time. Citing a source proving weather that a city (or country) exists or
not takes fewer clicks and time than tagging the page, waiting a full 30
days, verifying that page never had sources (vandals may have intentionally
removed the source links), and actualy deleting it... If you want to go on a
delete craze, you are welcome to exercise it more productively on orphaned
fair use images and etc where the deletion is clearly warranted for legal
reasons if nothing else.
With the usual apologies for pointing out wrong words, I wonder
"whether" you really intend to talk about the notability of the
"weather" in these cities. ;-)
The handling of fair use images has controversial elements of its own.
I wonder if we might arrive at earlier solutions to these problems
without mixing them together.
This is really "curing the patient by
killing". You would be solving the
symptoms but the patient will not be benefiting from it.
When the surgery kills the patient perhaps we should sew the body back
up with colourful holiday ribbon.