On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:46 AM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
I agree that some *specific* details of how a person was verified could remain private. It is rather the method, scope, and result that should be made public so many eyes can self-validate that it's a method that is not trivial to fool.
Will
Good point, and sensible. On that note, I think we now agree more generally.
FT2