On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:46 AM, <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
I agree that some *specific* details of how a person
was verified could
remain private. It is rather the method, scope, and result that should be
made public so many eyes can self-validate that it's a method that is not
trivial to fool.
Will
Good point, and sensible. On that note, I think we now agree more generally.
FT2