Delirium-
> If we make this official policy, we abandon NPOV
for photos, for the
> reasons I have cited. Please refute my arguments or state clearly that you
> do want to abandon NPOV for photos.
You wish to adopt the principle that we should err on
the side of
showing photos, based on your personal point of view that people should
not find things offensive that you do not find offensive.
Not at all. I find many photos of violence offensive but would still
tolerate them if I was one out of 50 or 100 people who feels that way. Of
course I am anti-censorship and my arguments and rationalizations will
lean towards this (just like yours will lean towards a more mainstream
view), but to imply that they are therefore wrong would be an ad hominem
logical fallacy.
You have not offered a single plausible counter-argument on why, for
example, this would be any different from moving criticisms of Mother
Teresa to a separate page if the majority does not like to read about
them.
For what it's worth, I think the majority of
articles you have worked on
on Wikipedia are similarly flawed, as your idea of NPOV, couched in
rather pretentious language, is to promote your political ideology.
<snip>
I'll let your personal attack speak for itself.
Regards,
Erik