On Feb 8, 2008 10:51 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
together into one list makes no sense. ..... And what is the
Less articles to worry about. That's why we delete things than a
non-notable in the first place, as far as I can tell - they're not
worth having an extra article to monitor for vandalism, etc.
In what way is it easier to monitor for vandalism? I don't see it.
If anything, I'd think it'd be easier, actually. If someone
vandalizes [[Davik Kang]] and someone else vandalizes [[Siri Tachi]]
I'd rather have two entries in my watchlist than one (if I only had
one I might actually miss the first bit of vandalism). And what if
someone vandalizes the redirect? I don't see any validity to the
argument that these mega-articles are easier to maintain.