K P wrote:
I don't have things to bitch about in Pashtun articles, because there are no real Pashtun articles on Wikipedia.
It's worse than a double standard, that which is known is beaten down, but the undeclared is unworthy of being investigated, or even noticed. I'd rather have the enemy I know than the one every one is too scared to identify.
It's not that it's unworthy to investigate, it's just that it's much harder. You're saying that in the case of Pashtun POV-pushing, there are no identifiable organizations responsible and no specific identifiable articles where it's going on. What are we supposed to do about that?
So Israel acknowledges what every one else is doing, and we crack down on the Israli's declaration, but leave the rest to go on.
If there's Pashtun POV-pushing going on it's not because we _want_ it to go on, it's because we haven't been able to identify and stop it. This Israeli group is making it easy for us in this case, hence the strong reaction.
Perhaps version flagging will make it easier to identify and resolve these sorts of things in much the same way that it's intended to make vandalism easier to contain.