K P wrote:
I don't have things to bitch about in Pashtun
articles, because there
are no real Pashtun articles on Wikipedia.
It's worse than a double standard, that which is known is beaten down,
but the undeclared is unworthy of being investigated, or even noticed.
I'd rather have the enemy I know than the one every one is too scared
to identify.
It's not that it's unworthy to investigate, it's just that it's much
harder. You're saying that in the case of Pashtun POV-pushing, there are
no identifiable organizations responsible and no specific identifiable
articles where it's going on. What are we supposed to do about that?
So Israel acknowledges what every one else is doing,
and we crack down
on the Israli's declaration, but leave the rest to go on.
If there's Pashtun POV-pushing going on it's not because we _want_ it to
go on, it's because we haven't been able to identify and stop it. This
Israeli group is making it easy for us in this case, hence the strong
reaction.
Perhaps version flagging will make it easier to identify and resolve
these sorts of things in much the same way that it's intended to make
vandalism easier to contain.