I can't agree with this. The other day, I created a biography article
for an individual whose full name (including MI), date and place of
death, and age at death I had. I used the SSDI to obtain the date of
birth rather than leave a blank in the article, as I couldn't find it
elsewhere. No rational policy would preclude using the records for
something like this.
Newyorkbrad
On 4/30/07, Sam Blacketer <sam.blacketer(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On 4/30/07, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
2) Are such lookups in SSDI legitimate sourcing for articles, or are
they original research? I incline towards the latter, since there is
a leap between getting a name and making the decision that it is the
same person that feels like more of one than we should be making
without support from a source.
I would have thought that it is original research. The SSDI is by
definition a primary source; the fact that it happens to be fairly
easily available does not make it a 'published' source. Identifying
someone in the index by reference to their name and other known facts
(eg residence and birth date) is going into the primary sources to do
your own research.
Put it like this - if someone in there is notable, then their death
would have been noticed (from the SSDI at the very least) by some
proper secondary source.
--
Sam Blacketer
London E15
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l