I can't agree with this. The other day, I created a biography article for an individual whose full name (including MI), date and place of death, and age at death I had. I used the SSDI to obtain the date of birth rather than leave a blank in the article, as I couldn't find it elsewhere. No rational policy would preclude using the records for something like this.
Newyorkbrad
On 4/30/07, Sam Blacketer sam.blacketer@googlemail.com wrote:
On 4/30/07, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
- Are such lookups in SSDI legitimate sourcing for articles, or are
they original research? I incline towards the latter, since there is a leap between getting a name and making the decision that it is the same person that feels like more of one than we should be making without support from a source.
I would have thought that it is original research. The SSDI is by definition a primary source; the fact that it happens to be fairly easily available does not make it a 'published' source. Identifying someone in the index by reference to their name and other known facts (eg residence and birth date) is going into the primary sources to do your own research.
Put it like this - if someone in there is notable, then their death would have been noticed (from the SSDI at the very least) by some proper secondary source.
-- Sam Blacketer London E15
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l