On 7/4/07, Mark Gallagher m.g.gallagher@student.canberra.edu.au wrote:
That's odd. The Mangoe was gloating in the thread over there ------> that WikiAbuse[0] is necessary because everyone In The Know knows that Wikipedia can't be trusted not to engage in widespread cover-ups of its own history.
Um, not what I said. At least, not what I meant to say.
It is inevitable that some people will abuse their admin powers. There will always be other people who accuse them of such, rightly or wrongly. So sites like Wikiabuse may not be necessary (to whom?), but they are inevitable.