On 7/4/07, Mark Gallagher <m.g.gallagher(a)student.canberra.edu.au> wrote:
That's odd. The Mangoe was gloating in the thread
over there ------>
that WikiAbuse[0] is necessary because everyone In The Know knows that
Wikipedia can't be trusted not to engage in widespread cover-ups of its
own history.
Um, not what I said. At least, not what I meant to say.
It is inevitable that some people will abuse their admin powers. There
will always be other people who accuse them of such, rightly or
wrongly. So sites like Wikiabuse may not be necessary (to whom?), but
they are inevitable.