As long as everyone is allowed to share their views or just blatantly vote without properly explaining their vote. We're going to make mistakes. We can't fix that without doing something very unwiki. We should ignore votes that don't make a case on why a comic of a professional author shouldn't be included or make a wrong one based on the policy we've got.
--Mgm
On 10/25/05, Alphax alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Snowspinner wrote:
<snip> > Here's a first stab - people with documentable credentials in an area > that would, in the eyes of a reasonable layman, qualify them to make a > decision on the importance of a topic will be allowed to speedy keep > articles in the area of their credentials. >
Before anyone says "not Nupedia again", I think content inclusion guidlines are actually an area that needs a bit of credentialism.
Of course, we would still need to guard against POV pushing and original research, but it is certainly a better idea than many of the current ones.
Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQ13pfbMAAH8MeUlWAQjYmAf/bcTYoiiA2542LmR45oaM+HuY+FYDNMSS MDLC99OMxKCeSoFnixJvjE6ysG/xV/0wcKtbuC+wj8i6jLxNIOD934jj0AYtPS+n uLCT/tVOwB6x1MuzxMw0dIVAF7Ucc57sjs91etxUl85+j1Ng6JRDACmkhSV76HPO m99h+vfE3UxcvHuOWBuQhwN4VkeS8u2N56nRjOEDqSPgyTsFKCs2VUWHJUSPMkZJ dVAPRscDMyCluBvQTiYQC+kavy5hKgJT62xeGd2QqMPpch0X5SGpgRKin1bObW3o KkaE7oGwbZj9ZEHU732XF4zKeeUlyvjFdaiJr/bX6oIzP1qm/CrUBQ== =gX+/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l