As long as everyone is allowed to share their views or just blatantly
vote without properly explaining their vote. We're going to make
mistakes. We can't fix that without doing something very unwiki. We
should ignore votes that don't make a case on why a comic of a
professional author shouldn't be included or make a wrong one based on
the policy we've got.
--Mgm
On 10/25/05, Alphax <alphasigmax(a)gmail.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Snowspinner wrote:
<snip>
Here's a first stab - people with
documentable credentials in an area
that would, in the eyes of a reasonable layman, qualify them to make a
decision on the importance of a topic will be allowed to speedy keep
articles in the area of their credentials.
Before anyone says "not Nupedia again", I think content inclusion
guidlines are actually an area that needs a bit of credentialism.
Of course, we would still need to guard against POV pushing and original
research, but it is certainly a better idea than many of the current ones.
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQ13pfbMAAH8MeUlWAQjYmAf/bcTYoiiA2542LmR45oaM+HuY+FYDNMSS
MDLC99OMxKCeSoFnixJvjE6ysG/xV/0wcKtbuC+wj8i6jLxNIOD934jj0AYtPS+n
uLCT/tVOwB6x1MuzxMw0dIVAF7Ucc57sjs91etxUl85+j1Ng6JRDACmkhSV76HPO
m99h+vfE3UxcvHuOWBuQhwN4VkeS8u2N56nRjOEDqSPgyTsFKCs2VUWHJUSPMkZJ
dVAPRscDMyCluBvQTiYQC+kavy5hKgJT62xeGd2QqMPpch0X5SGpgRKin1bObW3o
KkaE7oGwbZj9ZEHU732XF4zKeeUlyvjFdaiJr/bX6oIzP1qm/CrUBQ==
=gX+/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l