On 5/30/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 30/05/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
certainly
not to override common sense. Now, granted, there are
relatively few occasions where a link to a site such as Wikipedia Review
is beneficial to the project, but it should be acknowledged that these
occasions exist,
Actually, I can't think of any occasion where such a link would be
beneficial to the project. What exactly did you have in mind?
A link to whichever attack site we're discussing? Pretty remarkable if
one turns up. A link to something that someone might construe as an
attack site in the future for their own bizzare purposes? As we have
seen, sadly, not improbable...
I'm not sure what you're saying. Under what circumstances would
linking to WR or a similar site be beneficial to Wikipedia? Please
give some specific examples, keeping in mind that Wikipedia is an
encyclopedia, and the purpose of Talk: pages is to discuss article
content, and that article content must comply with [[WP:V]] and
[[WP:RS]].
Jay.