On 5/30/07, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/05/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
certainly not to override common sense. Now, granted, there are relatively few occasions where a link to a site such as Wikipedia Review is beneficial to the project, but it should be acknowledged that these occasions exist,
Actually, I can't think of any occasion where such a link would be beneficial to the project. What exactly did you have in mind?
A link to whichever attack site we're discussing? Pretty remarkable if one turns up. A link to something that someone might construe as an attack site in the future for their own bizzare purposes? As we have seen, sadly, not improbable...
I'm not sure what you're saying. Under what circumstances would linking to WR or a similar site be beneficial to Wikipedia? Please give some specific examples, keeping in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and the purpose of Talk: pages is to discuss article content, and that article content must comply with [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]].
Jay.