In a message dated 6/22/2008 3:22:58 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, ian.woollard@gmail.com writes:
So far as I am aware the guy's name was placed in the public domain without his request, and this has been repeated by a bunch of publications. He also received a large award in an out of court settlement, and could possibly have a case against the wikipedia if they chose to *perpetuate* it (the wikipedia may not *ever* go away, but other publications tend to fade).>> ------------------------------------- This is not correct. Once the genie is out-of-the-bottle there is no law under which you can "sue" to silence it. "Naming" someone is not harassment, it is reporting. If you think it is, name one case, any case at all, where this theory has been successful in a finalized court proceeding. In the US.
**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)