David Gerard wrote:
On 30/08/06, Daniel Mayer <maveric149(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
Not a good idea since that is all we know about
most asteroids and those data would be far more
useful in a big table of asteroids, not on individual pages for each space rock.
In fact, the basics are already in the List of asteroids tables.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_asteroids_%2839001-40000%29
We can just add to the table.
Excellent! So what we need then is a forest of redirects.
- d.
Ok, this is an even better idea. I am a strong believer in the idea
that 50 articles that have no hope of ever becoming more than a stub can
(sometimes) make a single good article. We might want to add links to
the various online DB's that are essentially the primary sources for
most of this as well. I think most of the major astro catalogs are
available online now days.
SKL