David Gerard wrote:
On 30/08/06, Daniel Mayer maveric149@yahoo.com wrote:
Not a good idea since that is all we know about most asteroids and those data would be far more useful in a big table of asteroids, not on individual pages for each space rock. In fact, the basics are already in the List of asteroids tables. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_asteroids_%2839001-40000%29 We can just add to the table.
Excellent! So what we need then is a forest of redirects.
- d.
Ok, this is an even better idea. I am a strong believer in the idea that 50 articles that have no hope of ever becoming more than a stub can (sometimes) make a single good article. We might want to add links to the various online DB's that are essentially the primary sources for most of this as well. I think most of the major astro catalogs are available online now days.
SKL