Does NPOV or NOR allow analysis at all? Not in the slightest.
While it is meant to discourage pushing a viewpoint and putting uncited
research up on Wikipedia, what would happen if someone were to analyze a
point in an article?
In some cases it would seem to be pushing a point of view (even if the
opposite POV is expressed) and sometimes would cause an edit war
In other cases it would be seen as original research (oh no! You can't say
that without citing it!)
Maybe I'm just not understanding correctly what you mean by analyzing.
On 10/25/05, Koltwills(a)aol.com <Koltwills(a)aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 10/25/2005 5:28:50 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
ilyanep(a)gmail.com writes:
Agreed...and it could be argued that some of our policies prohibit such an
article from being created.
~Ilya N. (User:Ilyanep)
*applauding Daniel Smith's analysis of the comments in the Guardian
article"
Policies such as?
dcv
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
~Ilya N.