On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:31:12 +0000, "Relata
Refero"
<refero.relata(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> And to be clear here, what they agreed with
was that yes, this
> undoubtedly was indicative of a returning user. Which, as we know,
> is precisely the case.
How do you know that that was what they agreed
with? Have you seen
their personal communication on this subject with Durova?
And if they read that 'evidence' and wrote enthusiastically to Durova
"yes, definitely a WR troll! Good catch!", I'd like to know who these
people are so I can examine their future admin actions a little more
closely.
I saw no emails that said /anything like/ "definitely a WR troll!
Good catch!" I saw no emails indicating that Durova was considering
blocking !!. No evidence has ever been produced that said emails
ever existed. All we have is repeated demands that the obvious and
innocent explanation is not good enough, and calls for the emails
that don't exist. But Alec can't have them because... they don't
exist. Durova did not run the block by anybody, as far as I'm
aware; certainly not on the lists that everyone is so wound up
about. I have checked. None of her emails even hint at a likely
block.
Durova has claimed she discussed the case in depth with five other
editors - Guy, are you saying that Durova is a liar?