Thomas Dalton schrieb:
If you are not
compromising on anything, you can't be neutral either.
I don't see why not. Compromising is doing or accepting something you
don't want in order to be able to do something you do want. I don't
see what that has to do with being neutral. I edit Wikipedia in order
to make a good quality neutral encyclopaedia, that's what I want. I
don't want to use it to spread by own opinions - I don't include
things I don't agree with just so that I can include the parts I do
agree with, I include them because I actually want them to be there.
Sometimes it happens, that other editors desire to include things
you don't agree with. In order to write a neutral encyclopaedia
it can be necessary to give even those POVs a fair share. As long
as you believe, that *you know* what neutrality means and don't have
to compromise, you are as likely as not working against neutrality.
I don't dispute, that you want to write a neutral encyclopedia.
But your believe, that you alone can know exactly what neutrality
means in a particular case, is an illusion.
--
Raphael