Thomas Dalton schrieb:
If you are not compromising on anything, you can't be neutral either.
I don't see why not. Compromising is doing or accepting something you don't want in order to be able to do something you do want. I don't see what that has to do with being neutral. I edit Wikipedia in order to make a good quality neutral encyclopaedia, that's what I want. I don't want to use it to spread by own opinions - I don't include things I don't agree with just so that I can include the parts I do agree with, I include them because I actually want them to be there.
Sometimes it happens, that other editors desire to include things you don't agree with. In order to write a neutral encyclopaedia it can be necessary to give even those POVs a fair share. As long as you believe, that *you know* what neutrality means and don't have to compromise, you are as likely as not working against neutrality.
I don't dispute, that you want to write a neutral encyclopedia. But your believe, that you alone can know exactly what neutrality means in a particular case, is an illusion.