Karl Wick wrote:
What problems
are you seeing with the GFDL that the "Creative
Commons" license (which I'm not familiar with) would solve?
The main problem I see with the GNU FDL as it stands is
that it demands that any work that uses any of its content
must be released under the same GNU FDL license. [...]
Or, adapting
another license like one of the Creative Commons ones.
Thats the only way I see that will prevent eternal,
unmixable forks of content.
Can you lay out in easy terms for a newbie like me what the Creative
Commons license is, and what its major differences to the GFDL are? Or
is there a webpage that explains this? (I honestly don't really want to
read the actual license; I can hardly ever follow such texts.)
Thanks,
Timwi