Karl Wick wrote:
What problems are you seeing with the GFDL that the "Creative Commons" license (which I'm not familiar with) would solve?
The main problem I see with the GNU FDL as it stands is that it demands that any work that uses any of its content must be released under the same GNU FDL license. [...] Or, adapting another license like one of the Creative Commons ones. Thats the only way I see that will prevent eternal, unmixable forks of content.
Can you lay out in easy terms for a newbie like me what the Creative Commons license is, and what its major differences to the GFDL are? Or is there a webpage that explains this? (I honestly don't really want to read the actual license; I can hardly ever follow such texts.)
Thanks, Timwi