David Gerard wrote:
On 30/04/07, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi(a)gmail.com>
An easy ethical solution to this would be for the
WMF to go on the record of
stating what their relationship, financial or otherwise, was with any and
all websites listed in the Interwiki map.
I suggest you are ill-placed to mention the word "ethical" in
connection to anything anyone else should do, particularly Wikipedia:
Can we please stick to the subject?
I happen to agree that *perception* is important in this case. While our
goals have to do with promoting free content, those goals will be
hindered by the perception of any conflict of interest or shady
I for one want to make sure there is no unnecessary ammunition for those
who want to discredit Wikipedia or the Foundation.