On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:15:39 -0400, "The Mangoe" the.mangoe@gmail.com wrote:
So you're saying that Brandt's posts in that thread are falsifications?
Prove they aren't. The onus is on the person proposing content to demonstrate its reliability. Here, I don't see that. Brandt's website would be a different matter, in that he could correct content he later realises is wrong, and it does not get a pile-on of disgruntled banned trolls.
Guy (JzG)