On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:15:39 -0400, "The Mangoe" <the.mangoe(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
So you're saying that Brandt's posts in that
thread are falsifications?
Prove they aren't. The onus is on the person proposing content to
demonstrate its reliability. Here, I don't see that. Brandt's
website would be a different matter, in that he could correct content
he later realises is wrong, and it does not get a pile-on of
disgruntled banned trolls.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG