Technical salvation:
Voting on *article quality rank* will allow for some
degree of handling. People might even be able to
mass-delete entire ranks of low-quality articles,
provided theyve seen enough votes. The difference
being that its not from removed from the article at
VFD, but part of the article's local aspects, just
like discussion, watch, etc. This removes the need for
executioners, and leaves only the trashtakers, who
dont need to argue, if they follow the guidelines.
Central lists would be viewable via sorted RC.
SV
--- Delirium <delirium(a)hackish.org> wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
I'm not sure the current operation of VFD
could
fairly have been predicted
early enough to strangle it at birth. We need a
deletion mechanism, but not
this one.
It seemed to work well enough for the 8-10 months I
was actively
involved in voting/discussing/closing entries there.
There were still
complaints, but mostly from "inclusionists" who
disliked it simply
because it was a venue for deleting articles.
Is it significantly worse now, or just scales badly,
or have the
inclusionists simply gotten louder voices? I must
confess I haven't
messed with it in 6 months or so just because I lost
interest in most
meta-pages and went back to writing articles. =]
-Mark
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com