On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:48:37 -0400, Jeff Raymond
<jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com> wrote:
>> I think this is an important distinction.
Often, the Amazon link is the
>> easiest, best, most reliable source for a certain fact in an article.
> Um, except that in the particular case at issue,
it also turned out to
> be wrong...
Well, at least inconsistent with other, less-reliable
sources.
No, inconsistent with *all* other sources. The idea that they are
less reliable despite being right when Amazon is wrong is somewhat
perverse.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG