Robert wrote:
If you truly believe in these claims, then spend your
time
gathering more proof, and less time making strawman ad
homenim attacks on "the science lobby". The more you do
this, the less your position is accepted.
I would be most interested to hear where you got the impression that Ray
believes in ESP. Such was neither stated nor implied by his email, and I
have no clue whatsoever of his stance on the issue. I simply saw an
attempt to point out a neutrality problem.
There is also no reason to get piqued over his use of the term "science
lobby". It is a generic label for advocates of mainstream science. He
was not implying some sort of overarching organization or cabal.
If Ray is mistaken about something, by all means offer him corrected
information, but there is no reason to either assume malice on his part
or direct malice at him.