On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Andrew Gray<andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
2009/8/21 quiddity <pandiculation(a)gmail.com>om>:
For example, we have these pages, that are
variously explicating,
disambiguation, and listing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_(disambiguation)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_water
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Water
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Water
which in the main article, [[Water]], even manages to bring us back to
the original topic, of yes, excessive or inappropriate hatnotes could
be considered harmful!
I see the "outlines of X" pages are spreading. Last I saw, they were
being added in "see also" sections - when did they leap to the
forefront of the article?
It was an experiment that was being tested a few months ago. No new
hatnotes are being added for these (afaik), but the old ones haven't
all been cleaned up yet.
Quiddity