On 5/29/07, David Mestel <david.mestel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Here's an idea: why not noindex BLPs while they're being considered on
AfD.
We get the best of both worlds, since as the article isn't the number one
ghit, there's no need to speedy non-outrageous articles. I guess we'd
also
need to noindex the AfDs themselves.
What would be the purpose of noindexing the article which isn't better
solved by judicious application of WP:BLP? I thought the whole argument for
noindexing was that these articles might get vandalized and not noticed.
But an article which is currently being discussed on AfD should have plenty
of eyeballs on it.
Anthony
On 27/05/07, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 5/27/07, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Andrew Gray wrote:
>On 27/05/07, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>That wouldn't really solve the problem at all - it's quite possible
to
> >>>have a stable-but-crap article. "Stable" only really means
"pretty
> >>>likely it doesn't say Joe is Gay anywhere"...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>If you apply that limitation to stable versions you are
right.
Stable
> >>versioning, however, should be
developed to the point where it can
do
a
>lot
more.
>
>
Mmmm.... then we're really talking reviewed versions, or finalised
versions, or revision rating structures, or something like that.
Yes, whatever we choose to call it.
[[Silver bullet]]s, maybe?
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l