On 5/29/07, David Mestel david.mestel@gmail.com wrote:
Here's an idea: why not noindex BLPs while they're being considered on AfD. We get the best of both worlds, since as the article isn't the number one ghit, there's no need to speedy non-outrageous articles. I guess we'd also need to noindex the AfDs themselves.
What would be the purpose of noindexing the article which isn't better solved by judicious application of WP:BLP? I thought the whole argument for noindexing was that these articles might get vandalized and not noticed. But an article which is currently being discussed on AfD should have plenty of eyeballs on it.
Anthony
On 27/05/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 5/27/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Andrew Gray wrote:
On 27/05/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
That wouldn't really solve the problem at all - it's quite possible
to
have a stable-but-crap article. "Stable" only really means "pretty likely it doesn't say Joe is Gay anywhere"...
If you apply that limitation to stable versions you are
right. Stable
versioning, however, should be developed to the point where it can
do
a
lot more.
Mmmm.... then we're really talking reviewed versions, or finalised versions, or revision rating structures, or something like that.
Yes, whatever we choose to call it.
[[Silver bullet]]s, maybe? _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- David _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l