On 2/8/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On blocks, I've always believed in subjecting my
blocks to review. I
perform the block and write it up on Administrators' Noticeboard. In
my experience it makes for firmer blocks, far less likely to be
challenged. One or two reviews of this kind have resulted in blocks
being extended as administrators pieced together more incriminating
information suggesting a long term career of abuse, which was not
immediately apparent to me or any of the previous blocking admins.
Funny, I thought that was standard process for all blocks. Should it not be?
Steve