On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:46:03 -0800, Ray Saintonge
<saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
To use NOR as a bare tool to
excuse the omission of information is a perversion of the basis for
having that guideline in the first place.
Depends on context. If the people pushing a very minor fringe theory
don't include sources, there really is no problem with removing it.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG