On 12/14/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/14/05, Kelly Martin
<kelly.lynn.martin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> There are way too many admins who shouldn't be, then.
It isn't as if we have the luxery to say
that.
Just what do you mean by that? There's no reason why we need to
continue to grant admin privileges to people who abuse them.
Kelly
We don't have enough active admins. Roveing the ones we do have on any
reasonable scale is not an option.
--
geni