On 21/09/2007, Durova nadezhda.durova@gmail.com wrote:
The reason NPOV is the most basic of principles is that without it, no source of information can be trusted, or is worth even producing. Fred, your well-intentioned policies will have the unintended end of destroying our credibility.
I agree entirely. Let us not forget which road is paved with good intentions.
Exactly how is NPOV at odds with Fred's position?
If I may quote [[WP:5]]: "Wikipedia has a neutral point of view, which means we strive for articles that advocate no single point of view. Sometimes this requires representing multiple points of view; presenting each point of view accurately; providing context for any given point of view, so that readers understand whose view the point represents; and presenting no one point of view as "the truth" or "the best view"."
Allowing some points of view to be censored clearly violates this.